Dear Mr Addison,
I am writing to you to express our
thanks for your more than prompt reply to our latest communication, and also to
answer some of the points you raise.
I will address them, as ever, in
order.
Firstly, I must take issue with your
description of our last as a "begging letter". It might perhaps more
properly be referred to as a "tax demand". This is how we, at the
Inland Revenue have always, for reasons of accuracy, traditionally referred to
such documents.
Secondly, your frustration at our
adding to the "endless stream of crapulent whining and panhandling vomited
daily through the letterbox on to the doormat" has been noted. However,
whilst I have naturally not seen the other letters to which you refer I would
cautiously suggest that their being from "pauper councils, Lombardy pirate
banking houses and pissant gas-mongerers" might indicate that your
decision to "file them next to the toilet in case of emergencies is at
best a little ill-advised.
In common with my own organisation,
it is unlikely that the senders of these letters do see you as a "lackwit
bumpkin or, come to that, a "sodding charity". More likely they see
you as a citizen of Great Britain, with a responsibility to contribute to the
upkeep of the nation as a whole.
Which brings me to my next point.
Whilst there may be some spirit of truth in your assertion that the taxes you
pay "go to shore up the canker-blighted, toppling folly that is the Public
Services", a moment's rudimentary calculation ought to disabuse you of the
notion that the government in any way expects you to "stump up for the
whole damned party" yourself. The estimates you provide for the
Chancellor's disbursement of the funds levied by taxation, whilst colourful,
are, in fairness, a little off the mark. Less than you seem to imagine is spent
on "junkets for Bunterish lickspittles" and "dancing
whores" whilst far more than you have accounted for is allocated to, for
example, "that box-ticking facade of a university system."
A couple of technical points
arising from direct queries:
1. The reason we don't simply write
"Muggins" on the envelope has to do with the vagaries of the postal
system;
2. You can rest assured that
"sucking the very marrows of those with nothing else to give" has
never been considered as a practice because even if the Personal Allowance
didn't render it irrelevant, the sheer medical logistics involved would make it
financially unviable.
I trust this has helped. In the
meantime, whilst I would not in any way wish to influence your decision one way
or the other, I ought to point out that even if you did choose to "give
the whole foul jamboree up and go and live in India" you still owe us the
money. Please forward it by Friday.
Yours Sincerely,
H J Lee Customer Relations
No comments:
Post a Comment