THE assistant commissioner came out to the gate
to meet me. He was accompanied by a detective superintendent from the Garda
Bureau of Fraud Investigation.
The two men escorted me through the front yard
of Garda headquarters, in the Phoenix Park. The assistant commissioner was
welcoming, although my presence must have been one giant pain in the neck for
him.
I was there for an interview. The previous
week, the newspaper for which I worked, The Sunday Tribune, had published a
major story, claiming that an insurance firm used serving gardaí as claims
agents.
Conor McMorrow, who now reports on politics for
RTÉ, and myself were responsible for the report. Its implications were of such
gravity that the then minister for justice, Michael McDowell, immediately
called in the garda commissioner and ordered an investigation. This was in
2006, not long before the garda ombudsman opened for business.
I was brought up a grand staircase to a
boardroom with high ceilings and elaborate cornices, where hung large portraits
of past commissioners and senior figures in the force.
The three of us sat at one end of a long and
expensive dining table, and the interview began. It was the most incongruous
place imaginable to be interviewed as part of a major garda investigation.
Of course, the whole thing was a sham. They
knew I’d no intention of saying where McMorrow and I had got the story. But we
went through the formalities, the superintendent writing out my statement in
long-hand, both men trying hard to look interested and engaged, considering the
seriousness of the matter.
Afterwards, the assistant commissioner saw me
out to the gate again and he couldn’t have been more cordial. I left that day
telling myself that an investigation run by these nice, and obviously highly
competent officers, might actually bear fruit.
Some weeks later, another interview was
conducted, this time in the less salubrious surroundings of an interview room
in Mountjoy station.
The two detectives involved didn’t try as hard
to look interested.
Further weeks later, I was called again. This
time, the interview was more informal, in a pub in Ballymun. The two detectives
were new to me. Now and then, one of them scribbled a few words on a folded
sheet of paper. I realised that a lot of officers, and hours, were being
nominally invested in this inquiry, into what could be a scandal of major garda
malpractice.
By then, wiser heads had put me right. Nothing
would come of the investigation. It didn’t matter a whit whether the story was
correct or not. It certainly didn’t matter that some insurance claimants may
have been intimidated by the sight of somebody they recognised as a garda
appearing at their door, representing an insurance company.
All that mattered was that this had the
potential for scandal, and, therefore, it wouldn’t see the light of day.
An investigation ordered by the minister for
justice would be resourced to the hilt, and a full report compiled, but the
outcome would never be in doubt: move along now, nothing to see here.
A few months before my visit to garda HQ, I was
present at the ultimate outcome of another garda investigation. The murder of
Rachel O’Reilly had become a huge national story. Her husband, Joe, had
appeared on the Late Late Show with Rachel’s parents to appeal for help in
catching the killer. Subsequently, he had been arrested and charged with the
murder.
The trial was one of the first to feature
mobile-phone technology, used in this case to trace Joe O’Reilly’s movements on
the day of the murder. Huge resources were deployed in the investigation.
The courtroom was packed when the jury returned
its verdict, late on a Friday evening. When the guilty verdict was announced,
the room exploded in a triumphant roar. It was highly inappropriate for a
courtroom, and particularly a murder trial, but the momentary lapse of reason
was entirely human. Members of Rachel O’Reilly’s family turned to some of the
gardaí who had been involved and hugged them. More than one officer was in
tears.
That case had been an example of members of the
force working beyond the call of duty, in the best traditions of policing,
comforting victims with their application, and doggedly pursing wrongdoing.
On the ground, at the more routine level of
policing, many will recognise the type of gardaí who do a good and
conscientious job. (There are others who are either incompetent or lazy. That’s
not unique to the gardaí, but is more problematic, because of the repercussions
such shortcomings have for citizens and the victims of crime).
The raft of scandals over the last number of
months will have impacted on the morale of good cops, although I have been
contacted by some officers who are welcoming of anything that might lead to a
cultural shift in the force.
The prevailing culture resembled nothing as
much as that within the Catholic Church. In both cases, the foot soldiers, to a
large extent, enjoyed the confidence of the community. Their respective briefs
were straightforward and morally correct. They were largely on the side of
right.
At the upper echelons, the moral compass was
all over the shop. When bad things happened, the main thing was to avoid
scandal; to place the institution above reproach, whatever the cost; to keep
the power intact.
Any dirty linen was washed internally, and if
everybody didn’t emerge smelling of roses, well, that was nobody else’s
business one way or the other.
In such an environment, those within the ranks
who are less than morally upright have the potential to stray, knowing that
they can act with impunity.
Before too long, the moral fibre of an
organisation is eaten away from within.
The events of the last week within the force
have been seismic. A commissioner has been forced out of the job, to a certain
extent because of the actions of a lowly sergeant challenging the prevailing
culture. Without the dogged pursuit of wrongdoing by Maurice McCabe, there
never would have been the controversies that precipitated the commissioner’s
departure.
The controversies have also, finally, led to a
point where some form of policing authority will replace the direct control of
the force by politicians. This is a basic measure, required if the negative
aspects of the prevailing culture are to be tackled.
Martin Callinan’s career didn’t end the way he
would have liked. He may well have been shafted by his political masters. But
the manner of his departure has finally opened up the way for a new dawn on the
force. Not withstanding the very good record of the interim commissioner, Nóirín
O’Sullivan, the first positive move would be to opt for an appointment from
outside the force to fill the vacant job.
Michael Clifford
No comments:
Post a Comment